April 6, 1993 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Nonmethane Organic Compounds (NMOC) and Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Monitoring Required for the Empirical Kinetics Modeling Approach (EKMA) for Nonattainment Areas in Ohio FROM: Ellen Baldridge, Computer Specialist Model Application Section, SRAB, TSD (MD-14) TO: Rebecca Calby, Regional Meteorologist Regulation Development Branch, Region V (AR-18J) In response to your request on the above subject, the Model Clearinghouse has reviewed your position on the application of EKMA in Ohio. The most recent guidance on the use of EKMA (Environmental Protection Agency, 1989) is silent on the use of default ratios in EKMA State implementation plan (SIP) analyses. This implies that the use of such ratios is not generally recommended. Therefore, we endorse the approach you mention which entails collecting NMOC and NOx data in Toledo and Dayton consistent with monitoring guidance and requirements of the EKMA and subsequently using these data in the model. We believe this represents the most defensible modeling procedure and is the approach most consistent with the 1989 guidance for using EKMA. We understand, however, the concern you raise over the timing issue requiring a SIP remission to be in place by November 1993. We agree that prior to the availability of NMOC and NOx monitored data in Toledo and Dayton, it may be necessary to resort to other procedures for estimating the NMOC/NOx ratio. We agree that use of a default ratio is the only viable interim procedure open to Ohio for use in Toledo and Dayton. A question then arises as to what default value should be used. As you have noted, our earlier guidance suggested "~9.5:1" as a default value. More recent data compiled by Baugues (1991)--(See table 1) suggest typical 50th percentile ratios to be slightly lower (~8.8:1). This appears to be more in line with the middle of the distribution of ratios found in nearby cities. For example, the range of 25-75 percentile values of the ratios in Cleveland, Cincinnati, Detroit, and Indianapolis is 7.0-9.9; 6.4-9.1; 6.5-10.0; and 7.5-10.7 respectively. Thus, we recommend use of a default using more recent data. Attachment (Table 1) cc: P. Dolwick, Region V D. Grano, MD-15 T. Helms, MD-15 A. Van Meter, MD-14 D. Wilson, MD-14